CO129-134 - Public Offices - 1868 — Page 650

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed
Series Prev Next

It is now proposed without Bishop Alford's consent, to take away from him a certain part of the jurisdiction which he now exercises, and to create a new Bishop under the Act 5 & 6 Vict c. 6. and with this view, and for this purpose, it is proposed to revoke partially the former Order in Council, but to leave the Letters Patent & the Bishop unaltered.

It appears to us that the new Order in Council should not be passed without the consent of Bishop Alford to the limitation of his jurisdiction - assuming that jurisdiction was conferred on him by the former Order in Council and his Letters Patent, which incorporate those granted to Bishop Smith.

It appears to us, that while the See is full, no alteration in the limits of jurisdiction of the Bishops thereof should be made without the consent of the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Bishop of Victoria for the time being.

The Letters Patent should therefore, we think, be altered pro tanto with the consents before mentioned - Then the New Order in Council will be...

Edit History

2026-05-19 23:53:38 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
It is now proposed without Bishop Alford's consent, to take away from him a certain part of the jurisdiction which he now exercises, and to create a new Bishop under the Act 5 & 6 Vict c. 6. and with this view, and for this purpose, it is proposed to revoke partially the former Order in Council, but to leave the Letters Patent & the Bishop unaltered. It appears to us that the new Order in Council should not be passed without the consent of Bishop Alford to the limitation of his jurisdiction - assuming that jurisdiction was conferred on him by the former Order in Council and his Letters Patent, which incorporate those granted to Bishop Smith. It appears to us, that while the See is full, no alteration in the limits of jurisdiction of the Bishops thereof should be made without the consent of the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Bishop of Victoria for the time being. The Letters Patent should therefore, we think, be altered pro tanto with the consents before mentioned - Then the New Order in Council will be...
Baseline (Original)
It is now proposed without Bishops Alford's consent, to take away from hind a certain part of the jurisatie tion which he now exercises, and to create a 17 Bishop under the act 5 list c. 6. and with the view. and for this purpose, it is proposed to revoke partially the former Order in Council, but to leave the Letters Patent & the Bishop unali tered. It appears to us that the CA... Order in Council should not be passed ཚི ག ང པའི ས པ རྣམས པ ལ m without the consent of Bishop Alford to the livutation of his un jurisdiction - apuming that juristic. tion. tion was former w on 641 conferred in hind by the Order in Council and his Letters Patent, which incorporate those granted to Bishop Smith, it appears to us, that while the See is full limits of no alteration in the The Rivuese ar 7 the jurisdiction of the Bishops thereof should be made without the c consent t of the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Bishap of Victoria for the time being. The Letters Patent should therefore think he attereds pro tacito & with the consents before mentioned - Then the New Order in Council will be
2026-05-19 23:53:38 · Baseline
View content

It is now

proposed without Bishops

Alford's consent, to take

away from

hind a certain part of the jurisatie

tion which he now exercises, and

to create a

17

Bishop under the act

5 list c. 6. and with the view.

and for this purpose, it is proposed to revoke partially the former

Order in Council, but to leave the

Letters Patent & the Bishop unali

tered.

It appears to

us that the

CA...

Order in Council should not be

passed

ཚི ག ང པའི ས པ རྣམས པ ལ

m without the consent of Bishop Alford to the livutation of his un jurisdiction - apuming that juristic.

tion.

tion was

former

w

on

641

conferred in hind by the

Order in Council and his

Letters Patent, which incorporate

those granted to Bishop Smith,

it appears to us, that while the See is

full

limits of

no alteration in the

The Rivuese ar

7

the

jurisdiction of the Bishops thereof

should be made without the c

consent t of the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Bishap of Victoria for the time being.

The Letters Patent should therefore

think he attereds pro tacito &

with the consents before mentioned - Then the New Order in Council will

be

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.